The Psychology Of Economic Decisions

Posted on
What Is Behavioral Economics? Theories, Goals, and Applications
What Is Behavioral Economics? Theories, Goals, and Applications

Behavioral economics

Behavioral economics is essentially the study of how people actually make decisions, rather than how they should make them according to traditional economic models.

Traditional economics assumes people are rational, logical beings who always make choices that maximize their own self-interest. But in reality, our decisions are heavily influenced by psychological factors, emotions, and social pressures.

The Endowment Effect: Why We Overvalue What We Own

Imagine you bought a concert ticket for $100. The day of the concert arrives, and you realize you’re not feeling well. You’d probably be reluctant to sell the ticket for even slightly less than you paid, even if it means missing out on the concert entirely.

Behavioral Economics Infographic  BB International
Behavioral Economics Infographic BB International

This is the endowment effect in action. Once we own something, we tend to value it more than we would if we were considering buying it. We become emotionally attached and overestimate its worth.

Loss Aversion: The Fear of Losing Out

We feel the pain of a loss much more intensely than the pleasure of an equal gain. This is known as loss aversion.

For example, losing $100 feels worse than the joy of finding $100. This principle is exploited by marketers in many ways, such as emphasizing limited-time offers or highlighting the potential for “missing out.”

Framing Effects: How the Presentation Influences Our Choices

Behavioral Economics — beyond brain PT
Behavioral Economics — beyond brain PT

The way information is presented can significantly impact our decisions. This is known as the framing effect.

Example 1:

  • Option A: A surgery has a 90% success rate.
  • Option B: A surgery has a 10% failure rate.
  • Even though these options are essentially the same, people tend to prefer Option A because it’s framed in a more positive light.

  • Example 2:

  • Option A: 95% of people survive this disease.
  • Option B: 5% of people die from this disease.
  • Again, the same information, but Option A is more appealing due to its positive framing.

  • The Anchoring Effect: How Initial Information Influences Our Decisions

    The anchoring effect occurs when our initial exposure to information significantly influences our subsequent judgments, even if that initial information is irrelevant.

  • Example: Imagine you see a shirt priced at $100. Later, you see the same shirt on sale for $70. You might feel like you’re getting a great deal, even if the shirt’s actual value is closer to $50. The initial price of $100 anchored your perception of its value.
  • The Availability Heuristic: Overestimating the Likelihood of Vivid Events

    We tend to overestimate the likelihood of events that are easily recalled or come readily to mind. This is the availability heuristic.

  • Example: If you’ve recently seen news reports about plane crashes, you might be more likely to overestimate the risk of flying, even though statistically, flying is extremely safe.
  • Social Proof: Following the Crowd

    We often make decisions based on what others are doing. This is the principle of social proof.

  • Example: If you see a long line of people waiting for a restaurant, you might assume it’s a popular and good place to eat, even if you don’t know anything else about it.
  • The Sunk Cost Fallacy: Throwing Good Money After Bad

    The sunk cost fallacy refers to our tendency to continue investing in something, even when it’s clearly not a good decision, simply because we’ve already invested time or money in it.

  • Example: You’ve been working on a project for months, but it’s clearly not going well. Instead of cutting your losses and moving on, you continue to pour time and effort into it, hoping to salvage the situation.
  • The Status Quo Bias: Sticking with the Familiar

    We often prefer to maintain the status quo, even when there might be better alternatives available. This is the status quo bias.

  • Example: Many people stick with the same insurance company or internet service provider, even if they could find better deals elsewhere, simply because it’s easier to stick with what they’re used to.
  • The Halo Effect: Judging People Based on One Trait

    The halo effect occurs when our overall impression of a person influences how we perceive their other qualities.

  • Example: If we find someone attractive, we may also tend to perceive them as intelligent, kind, and trustworthy.
  • The Horns Effect: The Opposite of the Halo Effect

    The horns effect is the opposite of the halo effect. If we have a negative initial impression of someone, we may tend to perceive them negatively in other areas as well.

    The Bandwagon Effect: Joining the Crowd

    The bandwagon effect describes our tendency to conform to the beliefs or behaviors of the majority, even if we don’t necessarily agree with them.

  • Example: People may start buying a particular stock simply because everyone else is, regardless of its actual value.
  • The IKEA Effect: Overvaluing Things We Build Ourselves

    The IKEA effect refers to our tendency to overvalue things that we have created or assembled ourselves, even if they are not particularly well-made.

  • Example: You might feel a sense of pride and satisfaction in assembling a piece of furniture from IKEA, and you might be more likely to overvalue it compared to a similar piece of furniture that you purchased fully assembled.
  • The Paradox of Choice: Too Many Options Can Lead to Overwhelm and Inaction

    While having choices may seem like a good thing, too many options can actually lead to indecision and even regret. This is known as the paradox of choice.

  • Example: When faced with a vast array of products at the grocery store, you might feel overwhelmed and end up making an arbitrary choice or simply not buying anything at all.
  • The Planning Fallacy: Underestimating How Long It Will Take to Complete a Task

    We often underestimate the time and effort required to complete a task, even when we have previous experience with similar tasks. This is known as the planning fallacy.

  • Example: You might underestimate how long it will take to complete a renovation project, leading to delays and frustration.
  • The Optimism Bias: Believing We Are Less Likely to Experience Negative Events

    We tend to be overly optimistic about the future and underestimate our own vulnerability to negative events. This is known as the optimism bias.

  • Example: We may believe we are less likely to experience car accidents, health problems, or financial difficulties than other people.
  • The Confirmation Bias: Seeking Out Information That Confirms Our Existing Beliefs

    We tend to seek out information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore or downplay information that contradicts them. This is known as the confirmation bias.

  • Example: If you believe that climate change is a hoax, you might actively seek out news sources and articles that support this view, while ignoring or dismissing evidence to the contrary.
  • The Self-Serving Bias: Attributing Success to Ourselves and Failures to External Factors

    We tend to attribute our successes to our own skills and efforts, while blaming external factors for our failures. This is known as the self-serving bias.

  • Example: If you get a good grade on a test, you might attribute it to your hard work and intelligence. However, if you get a bad grade, you might blame the teacher for being unfair or the test for being too difficult.
  • The Endowment Effect in Action: Marketing and Pricing Strategies

    Marketers often exploit the endowment effect to increase sales. For example:

    Free trials: Offering free trials allows customers to experience a product or service, making them more likely to value it and purchase it later.

  • “Try before you buy” policies: These policies allow customers to test products before committing to a purchase, increasing their attachment to the product.
  • Limited-time offers: Creating a sense of urgency can make customers feel like they are losing out if they don’t buy immediately, triggering loss aversion.

  • Loss Aversion in Marketing: The Fear of Missing Out (FOMO)

    Marketers frequently leverage loss aversion to drive sales. For example:

    Limited-time discounts: Creating a sense of urgency and the fear of missing out on a good deal.

  • Exclusive offers: Making customers feel special by offering them access to exclusive deals or products.
  • Social media campaigns: Highlighting how many other people are already using or enjoying a product or service.

  • Framing Effects in Marketing: How to Present Your Products and Services

    Focus on the positive: Frame your products and services in a positive light, emphasizing their benefits and advantages.

  • Use strong guarantees: Offer strong guarantees to reduce customer risk and increase their confidence in your product.
  • Highlight what customers stand to gain: Emphasize the positive outcomes that customers can expect to experience by using your product or service.

  • The Anchoring Effect in Negotiations: Setting the Initial Price

  • Setting an initial price: In negotiations, the first price offered can significantly influence the final outcome. The initial price acts as an anchor, affecting both parties’ perceptions of what is a fair price.
  • The Availability Heuristic and News Media: The Power of Vivid Stories

    News media often relies on the availability heuristic to capture our attention. Vivid and emotionally charged stories, even if they are rare or unlikely, are more likely to be reported and remembered.

    Social Proof in Marketing: Leveraging Testimonials and User Reviews

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *